On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:23:28PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:10:53AM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 11:03:09AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > Description: Replace deprecated interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() with 
> > > direct
> > > wait-queue usage. Also replace some rather odd wait-queue usage with the
> > > existent macros. Also adjusted the wake_up_interruptible() call 
> > > appropriately,
> > > as I changed all the states to TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE (signals were not be 
> > > checked
> > > in the current code). Patch is compile-tested.
> > 
> > Patch was broken in various ways. Fixed-up below (ends up being fewer
> > changes). Please drop previous patch and apply the attached.
> > 
> > Description: Replace deprecated interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() with
> > direct wait-queue usage. Patch is compile-tested.
> 
> Original patch was merged into 2.6.11-rc2. Incremental patch for
> 2.6.11-rc2 attached.
> 
> Description: First patch incorrectly changed state of the wait-queue
> usage to TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE. Reverted to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE.

Applied, thanks.

greg k-h


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to