On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 02:33:28AM -0400, Adam Belay wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 01:39:20PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > I believe it should just do suspend(PMSG_SUSPEND) before system > > > shutdown. If you think distintion between shutdown and suspend is > > > important (I am not 100% convinced it is), we can just add flag > > > saying "this is system shutdown". > > > > > > Actually this patch should be in the queue somewhere... We had it in > > > suse trees for a long time, and IMO it can solve problem easily. > > > > I think we probably want a distinct state for shutdown ... > > Yes, it's possible we do. I'm not sure what every platform requires. The > question is should we make this change to pm_message_t in the short term? > "->shutdown", even though incorrect, seems to fill this role. > > Greg, have you seen shutdown methods doing anything special other than > standard "->suspend" stuff?
Don't know, never looked. Try looking at the system and platform drivers, I think those are the only ones that have that callback hooked up right now. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
