On Mon, 23 May 2005 17:53:53 -0700 Jeff Carr wrote:
| The text for the USB_MON option is confusing as to what was intended.
| (This was from linux-2.6.11-rc4-git7)
|
| Jeff
| USB Monitor (USB_MON) [M/n/?] (NEW) ?
Does simply changing this to
USB Traffic Monitor (USB_MON) ...
help? What would make it clear to you? Maybe add:
This option has nothing to do with Video Displays or Monitor devices.
also?
It would help to be constructive in your message, not just saying
"X is bad," but also say "here's what to do to fix it."
| If you say Y here, a component which captures the USB traffic
| between peripheral-specific drivers and HC drivers will be built.
| The USB_MON is similar in spirit and may be compatible with Dave
| Harding's USBMon.
|
| This is somewhat experimental at this time, but it should be safe,
| as long as you aren't building this as a module and then removing it.
|
| If unsure, say Y. Do not say M.
|
| USB Monitor (USB_MON) [M/n/?] (NEW)
---
~Randy
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
