dekkker wrote: > > usb-storage: This device (059f,a601,0200 S 01 P 01) has an unneeded Protocol > entry in unusual_devs.h > Please send a copy of this message to > <[email protected]>
Can you please try the attached patch? > This appeared in my dmesg when I connect the mentioned disk. > > mount says: /dev/sda1 is not a valid block device. This is unrelated - is the disk partitioned? -- Phil Dibowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freeware and Technical Pages Insanity Palace of Metallica http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/ "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759
This patch removes an unneeded entry in unusual_devs.h. Signed-off-by: Phil Dibowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff -puN drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h~unusual_lacie drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h --- linux-2.6.12-rc3/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h~unusual_lacie 2005-06-22 22:48:08.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.6.12-rc3-phil/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h 2005-06-22 22:48:19.000000000 -0700 @@ -469,18 +469,6 @@ UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x0595, 0x4343, 0x0000, 0x "Digital Camera EX-20 DSC", US_SC_8070, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL, 0 ), -/* The entry was here before I took over, and had US_SC_RBC. It turns - * out that isn't needed. Additionally, Torsten Eriksson - * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is able to use his device fine - * without this entry at all - but I don't suspect that will be true - * for all users (the protocol is likely needed), so is staying at - * this time. - Phil Dibowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - */ -UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x059f, 0xa601, 0x0200, 0x0200, - "LaCie", - "USB Hard Disk", - US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_CB, NULL, 0 ), - /* Submitted by Joel Bourquard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Some versions of this device need the SubClass and Protocol overrides * while others don't. _
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
