Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 13:16:58 -0400, Nick Sillik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The kcalloc with a constant 1 argument is exceedingly fishy. Too bad
I did not pay attention when someone proposed it. On the other hand,
I never have time for good flamewars these days...
Well, unless I'm missing something, I see a number of calls to kcalloc
with '1' as the firt paramerter. Honestly, it seems like that usage is
more common than others. Who knows, if there is another way to do this
better, please let me know.
Nick Sillik
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
