On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, David Brownell wrote: > Considering that _only_ the last byte of that response was garbage, > and the others looked just fine, there's no reason to think this is > anything other than some kind of peripheral bug.
There is indeed such a reason. Craig reported that the device worked fine, with no bad status bytes, when plugged into a regular PC. > Occam's razor applies here. Thinking the bug is in usbcore or > even the hcd means lots of other people would see the same bug. Only if lots of other people were using that HCD. Since it's a MIPS-based SOC with a built-in USB 2.0 core running 2.4.30, I doubt that is the case. Of course, the problem could lie in the SOC hardware and not in the software at all. > Yet judging by reports -- and knowing that those critical paths > haven't changed in a long time, so there'd have been plenty of > time for reports to appear -- that hasn't happened. Time will tell... Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
