Thanks for the pointer Pete! I'm now happily running a 2.6.13 kernel
and things work the way I'd expect.
And I wouldn't have thought 2.6.8 is considered ancient, but I suppose
it has been a while... At least I wasn't running 2.4!
Thanks again,
-Shane
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:28:02 -0500, Shane Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've done a bit of digging into the
kernel source (2.6.8 on debian) and I think that the usb disconnect
needs to let the tty layer know that something happened since (I think)
No surprise here. Remember the old joke: When is it the time to cut a
Debian release? Answer: When every package is sufficiently obsolete.
Try something more modern. I just verified that 2.6.12 calls
tty_hangup() from usb_serial_disconnect(), which takes care of this.
-- Pete
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
