> > Why would a usb-storage device ever report itself as scsi0 > if it actually > > supports scsi3? Is it because the USB/ATA bridge spec > doesn't support asking > > the device it self, so the usb-subsystem just makes an (un? > ;)-educated > > guess? Or is it because it is possible, but the devices > can't be trusted to > > tell the truth? > > It's the last one. Lots and lots of devices lie outright about this. > > Matt
I don't suppose you might have an alternative solution for allowing scsi0 devices to accept things like the SCSI-ATA passthru cdb unmangled by LUN info then? Tim ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
