I include the entry to one usb flash disk that had problem here. I
think is really good to include it on 2.6.14 since its very
trivial
and worked fine here.
I'm not a big fan of doing the entire 0000-9999 range unless you
have
some idea that lots of devices in the range are affected.
I didn't find how I can identify the values to put there. If you say
to me I can do that and provide the specific information to you.
...
P: Vendor=10d6 ProdID=1100 Rev= 1.00
...
P: Vendor=054c ProdID=019d Rev= 1.00
These appear to be instances of USB idProduct: idVendor: bcdDevice
I didn't follow what you meant. Please explain.
I can explain better if you can give me the URL of an archive of the
original patch?
The basic idea is that a patch for idVendor=x054C idProduct=x0000-
x9999 can instead be a patch for just idVendor=x054C idProduct=x019D
if we have reason to believe that only idVendor=x054C idProduct=x019D
was observed to need the patch.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
