On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:46:26 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > But even if it does, my patch saved reading, so I think it should be > > > applied as well. > > > > What you mean by "saved reading"? > > The diffstat was almost all dashes: 13 deletions, 1 addition. > > > Btw, do we really need to export "nousb" in sysfs? > > Nobody would die if we didn't, but there's nothing wrong with the idea > in general. At least you'd know that the parameter was actually parsed. > I wish usb-handoff was exported similarly, because there's absolutely > no way to tell if it worked or was quietly ignored. And I abhor printks > in normal or success cases, so I do not want such indication.
usb-handoff no longer exists. The kernel now takes USB host controllers away from the BIOS as soon as they are discovered. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
