On Sad, 2006-01-07 at 15:21 -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 23:11:07 +0000, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > wait_event(tty_ldisc_wait, tty_ldisc_try(tty));
>
> That is more or less all right, I agree. It is still somewhat limited
> because the lock cannot be held across the loop into its body, so
> actions cannot be taken atomically with the condition.
If that is the needed case you do something like
wait_event(foo_wait, foo_and_lock(foo));
blah
unlock(foo)
Alan
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
