On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Marc Singer wrote: > Ah. I misunderstood. Besides, the patch I wrote is wrong. It isn't > desc that is NULL, it's udev->config[i].intf_cache[0].
That's right. > I'll try your patch, but it looks like you made the same mistake I did > in assuming that it was the desc that is NULL. No I didn't. Look again. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
