Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > openct uses > open(device, O_EXCL | O_RDWR); > > so, I would assume that only one process can open a device > like this. unfortunatly this is not true: I have two processes > that have the same device opened this way. > > note: I used /dev/bus/usb/*/* files, not the old usbfs.
found it. for some reason I had one process on /dev/bus/usb/*/* and one on /proc/bus/usb/*/*. Since that is inside the kernel the same resource, wouldn't honoring O_EXCL be good? or is it tradition that only the filename is important, not what is behind it? Thanks, Andreas ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
