Pete Zaitcev wrote: > Excuse me! This was not part of the deal. Here's what you proposed > originally: ... > Neither of the above tries to bust MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE. Why don't > you just come clean with your real aim?
Sorry, I didn't mean any offense- and the MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE change certainly isn't my "real aim", it just seemed very relevant to the discussion on arbitrary limits in usbfs. It appears to be more controversial than I expected- that's fine. We can argue about it when I submit it as a separate patch. --Micah ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
