On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:59:21 -0400, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 12:25:37PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:01:32 +0100, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > When you plug the device in, usb-storage picks it up, but during the 5 > > > second delay_use pause, the device gets bored and disconnects itself. It > > > then reconnects and the process repeats. > > > > Bias it to ub :-) > > Why the huge pause, anyway? [...] > Could the delay be isolated to the devices that need it?
It looks that you answered your question yourself. The usb-storage deals with generally worse worst cases than ub. Can it be isolated? Maybe. To do it, we need a lot of reports from users and we will get regressions along the way. This is something Matt decides to do or not to do. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
