On Monday 31 July 2006 7:26 am, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, David Brownell wrote: > > > > > > Are you asking why the method is per-bus? I don't know; the current > > > > > implementation doesn't use this feature. > > > > > > > > At least sl811-hcd could use it, and in general the dma issues need > > > > to be tied to the underlying usb_bus not a usb_device since that's how > > > > the operations work. > > > > > > What could the HCDs do that would be any better than hcd_buffer_alloc? > > > > In that case, kmalloc. > > How is that better? It's exactly what hcd_buffer_alloc does when the DMA > mask is 0.
I see what you're saying ... OK, agreed, those calls don't need to go into ops vectors at all. Patch at will. :) - Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
