On Tuesday 12 September 2006 07:44, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Iñaky Pérez-González wrote: > > On Friday 08 September 2006 07:30, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Yep, the initial reset that brings the device back to default state/addr0 > > always happens. However, it seems like that is not affecting my device as > > 'badly' (so to speak) as a direct reset with the port enabled. I'd say > > the internal logic is considering two different resets: one with the port > > disabled, than simply moves in to enable and the one with the port > > enabled, that is interpreted as hard-core reset. I wonder if this is > > common behavior, and I'll try to check with the USB spec guys tomorrow. > > Note that the normal device initialization process does _two_ port resets. > The first is with the port disabled but the second is with the port > enabled. So it should affect the device just as badly as > usb_reset_device. > > There must be something more to it. Something very strange about the > device itself. You are very right -- I am going to have to fix this at the device end; a chat with the fw guys is going to be the way to proceed. /me puts on the donkey ears and asks gregkh to definitely drop that patch ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
