On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Clemens Ladisch wrote:

> Christopher Monty Montgomery wrote:
> > I *must* be able to trust that an isoch stream will not randomly crash
> > and burn unrecoverably.  A stutter is bad enough, but having the only
> > underrun behavior be 'Oops!  Sorry!  You lose!' is not acceptable, and
> > I don't care how 'correct' it is to have a whole troupe of people
> > unhappy with me for the sound hardware failing again.
> 
> In the case of ALSA, it's the application's choice whether an underrun
> should stop the stream.  I don't know which application you were using,
> but in the case of Jack, it was decided that it would be better to
> have the stream stopped so that the xrun can be detected and reported
> instead of having an unexplained (or worse, undetected) stutter.

Would it be better to add a way for the kernel to inform the application 
that an xrun occurred?  Although I don't know how that would work...

Alan Stern


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to