On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 01:26:13AM -0400, Christopher Monty Montgomery wrote: > On 10/7/06, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Friday 06 October 2006 9:59 pm, Greg KH wrote: > >> > >> I didn't understand what was so objectionable with the alsa driver > >> change in the first place, but oh well, I'll wait for the next > >> iteration... > > > >One thing is that nothing actually prevented the resubmit from > >getting the same fault code ... so there was no guarantee that > >the problem actually got resolved!! :) > > I answered that objection; you can't get two EL2NSYNC in a row. The > first resets the stream (but does not revoke its bandwidth). EL2NSYNC > is not possible for the first URB submission after reset. So there > was a guarantee.
Monty, how does other operating systems report this back to the driver? I'm guessing that Windows uses yet-another-message, right? How about OS-X? thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
