Am Sonntag, 8. Oktober 2006 02:03 schrieb David Brownell:
> > The power management functions without
> > timeout are also exported. For other power control features like
> > cpu frequency considerable effort has been made to export them to
> > user space.
>
> Yes, and many of us use the much lighter weight kernel based control
> models by preference. Why waste hundreds of Kbytes of userspace for
> a daemon when a few hundred bytes of kernel code can implement a
> better and more reactive kernel policy for cpufreq?
That's an important aspect. How about implementing autosuspend
first and keeping the sysfs-based suspension for now? If autosuspend
is done, we have something to compare too. If a different solution
emerges to be advantagous under some conditions we can talk about
the interface later.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
