On Thursday 12 October 2006 17:26, Lee Revell wrote: > On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 13:56 -0700, Open Source wrote: > > Yes, I am pretty sure you are right about the timing. But it shouldn't be > > that way. If it is, then there's a bug. > > > > I'm fully willing to accept there is something else I should be doing > > driver-wise, but it shoudn't require recompiling the stock distribution > > kernels. Otherwise, Linux is not competitive with Microsoft Windows in > > this regard! > > > > I'll try a recompile and report back. In the meantime, if anyone else has > > any ideas, please let me know! > > > > Yes, I agree that it would be a bug. If it turns out to be related to > CONFIG_HZ, ask your distro why they rolled it back from 1000 to 250Hz.
If this turns out to be tied to the HZ rate its a bug. It _should_ not be using this timing to do this ergo bug. You may be able to bypass by using 1000Hz but this is not a fix... Ed Tomlinson ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
