On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On 12/6/06, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 18:28 schrieb Alan Stern: > > > In general I think it's more correct to pay attention to I/O errors and > > > try to repair them than to ignore them. After all, with any reasonable > > > device these errors do indicate a genuine problem. But with KVM switches > > > we don't have any choice. When you get right down to it, they break the > > > USB protocol. > > > > Then why do you solve this at the hid level? Shouldn't all errors going over > > such devices be ignored? > > > > Can you "see" that there is an USB KVM switch? PS/2 KVM switches are > "invisible" until they screw up selected protocol for you...
USB KVMs are just like that -- invisible until they mess up something else. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
