On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Here are some patches that move the HID code to a new directory allowing
> it to be used by other kernel subsystems easier.
I pulled. However, I think the Kconfig changes are HORRIBLE.
I don't understand why people don't use "select" more. Why should Kconfig
ask for "Generic HID support?" That question _never_ makes sense to a
user. And if you answer "n", you'll not get USB_HID.
This is not user-friendly. If you need HID support, just select it. Don't
ask people questions that make no sense. If the generic HID code is needed
for some driver, you just select it. If it's not needed, you don't. It's
that easy.
Linus
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
