On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 11:24 +0000, Tony Olech wrote: > Hi Dave, > > The problem I was faced with was getting such things as the > OHCI register layout info, and the solution I came up with > was using the existing header file. It would certainly be > better if the definitions pertaining to the OHCI controller > were in a seperate header file and could be included by all > the different drivers that require it. Such a patch would > affect the existing driver for PCI based OHCI controllers > as well ELAN's U132/FTDI based OHCI controller driver. > > Would it be OK for me to submit a patch to the existing > OCHI driver to separate out a header-file?
But then why did you redefine the quirks ? That's what I don't understand. Ben. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
