Am Donnerstag, 25. Januar 2007 16:49 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Am Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2007 17:57 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have a report about a device that will show an error with the
> > > > FIX_CAPACITY
> > > > quirk and another device that needs it. The descriptors are identical.
> > > > What
> > > > is to be done? Remove it, keep it, try some heuristic?
> > >
> > > It usually doesn't hurt to have an extra FIX_CAPACITY. In this case you
> > > might be able to solve the problem by asking the user to re-partition the
> > > device.
> >
> > The capacity is incorrect. Mishandling a compliant device is not really
> > acceptable and for existing disks repartitioning is not an option.
>
> Can you provide more details? For each of the two devices, what are:
>
> The apparent capacity with FIX_CAPACITY set?
Disk /dev/hda: 40.0 GB, 40007761920 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4864 cylinders
> The apparent capacity with FIX_CAPACITY not set (presumably
> exactly 1 block higher)?
Yes.
>
> The actual capacity?
Identical with the value above.
> The contents of the partition table?
>
> The exact errors encountered?
Not without going back to the reporter.
Is it important?
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
