Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And what Phil Endecott told is just a bug in GCC! I don't know if he > tried with and without optimization.
Oleg, I'm just a messenger. I'm just saying that I've encountered these things before, and I've asked the gcc experts, and I've told you what they say. If you think it's wrong, *please* go and ask the gcc people yourself, and then come back and tell us what they say. This is one of those subjects where, just as you think you almost understand it all, another huge level of complexity is revealed. As it happens, I was convinced by what the gcc people said. But even if you're right and it is a bug, it's a bug that we will have to live with since we can't say "you need gcc >4.x.y to compile linux-usb". Concerning optimisation, there is a danger that the problem can be optimised away in small test cases. I think that if you follow the thread that I linked to before you'll see exactly how the examples were compiled. Phil. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
