On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:30:16 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right now, I think transfer_flags would be useless. However I have in > mind the discussions with David and Monty back last November about > improved reliability and latency for ISO transfers. One of the outcomes > of that discussion was a proposal for a new transfer flag with > significantly different semantics from the existing URB_ISO_ASAP. > So overall my advice is this: If adding it in is at all tricky or awkward, > then don't bother. We won't miss it. Thanks for the insight. I found a place for transfer_flags in the binary API packet, so it's going to be there just in case, but not in text. My test application usbmon(1) outputs a text-compatible dump, so it ignores the field, but we can add a flag or something. I hope this is acceptable. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
