Am Sonntag, 25. Februar 2007 17:43 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Coming to think of it, maybe the confusion could be avoided, if
> > zero were accepted as a permissible value for autosuspend delay.
> > Is there a reason there has to be a delay?
>
> Yes. It's a bad idea to in general to disable any resource as soon as you
> are through using it, if enabling and disabling take a nontrivial amount
> of time.
This is true. Is that a reason to disallow it? We generally don't protect
people from themselves in kernel space.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
