Am Sonntag, 25. Februar 2007 17:43 schrieb Alan Stern: > On Sun, 25 Feb 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > Coming to think of it, maybe the confusion could be avoided, if > > zero were accepted as a permissible value for autosuspend delay. > > Is there a reason there has to be a delay? > > Yes. It's a bad idea to in general to disable any resource as soon as you > are through using it, if enabling and disabling take a nontrivial amount > of time.
This is true. Is that a reason to disallow it? We generally don't protect people from themselves in kernel space. Regards Oliver ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel