On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 12:47:10 +0100 (CET), Martin Drab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, good to know that at least on the Linux side this should be supported. > I read some comments on the net (probably describing some ancient version > of kernel or what), where there were some hints like that it may not be > supported. So I wasn't sure whether recent kernels are capable of it. Good > to know they are. 2.4 has special workarounds to allow it, but it's really ancient in 2007. For example, Red Hat shipped the last 2.4 based system five years ago. > After it gets stuck, when I switch off the device, all the scheduled URBs > return with -EPROTO error. But this is a good thing, isn't it? It happens because your device stopped replying to tokens while still attached to its hub port. It's not the same as the disconnect, which ends with different error code. Although perhaps I'm confused here. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
