On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Sam Liddicott wrote:

> From: "Greg KH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: 10/08/07 04:30
> 
> =There's no way we could ever get a list of all good or all bad printers,
> =so no matter what we do, we'd miss some :(
> 
> But better to miss suspend on some than miss working altogether on others 
> surely?
> 
> I never heard an outcry on lack if suspend that compares to that from those 
> whose USB devices stopped working when their distro upgraded the kernel.

Even if we don't handle printers right now, it would help to cover all
scanners with a single class-wide quirks entry instead of lots of
individual device entries.

Alan Stern


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to