On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 01:58:36PM +0200, Joerg Pommnitz wrote:
> --- Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: 
> > 
> > But if you want to patch the acm driver, you might want to do something
> > like what the usb-serial core does in creating the
> > /proc/tty/driver/usbserial file to show which device is attached to
> > which USB device.  That might solve your problem.
> > 
> > Hope this helps,
> > 
> > greg k-h 
> 
> Hi Greg,
> thanks for your advice. I'll take a look at this. 
> 
> Please bear with me while I ask a few more questions:
> 
> Commonly one refers to USB devices in the BUS:DEVICE scheme. My 
> understanding is, that a bus is equivalent to a host controller. Correct?

Yes.

> If so, this is a real physical entity that wont change without somebody 
> modifying the hardware.
> 
> The device number seems to be less predictable. My understanding is, that
> this number refers to the device address assigned during enumeration. Is
> this correct? If so, is there a way to trace this back to one particular
> physical USB port either on the host controller or a hub?

Take a look at the usb-serial way of doing this.  It exports the
physical tree location of the device, which is what it is sounding like
you are looking for.

Hope this helps,

greg k-h


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users

Reply via email to