Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Jan De Luyck wrote: > > >>On Monday 09 January 2006 16:16, Alan Stern wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Jan De Luyck wrote: >>> >>>>On Monday 09 January 2006 04:29, Matthew Dharm wrote: >>>> >>>>>What happens if you turn off multi-LUN probing in the SCSI core? >>>> >>>>I actually need that for my USB cardreader. Does using the parameter >>>>max_luns=1 constitute the same? >>> >>>Yes it does. Try this patch instead. >> >>Thanks! That does it, the drive works wonderfully now: > > >>and reading/writing from floppies works perfect. Can this patch be sent off >>to >>mainline? > > > Phil, have you been following this?
Nope, nor do I see the thread in my unread linux-usb-devel messages. Strange. > Matt, have you ever run across any multi-LUN UFI devices? Perhaps we can > save ourselves a lot of trouble by making them all automatically > single-LUN. Hmm. It seems intuitively wrong to make assumptions like that only about one kind of hardware. Plus, if we do this, then we might someday need a US_FL_MULTIPLE_LUN flag. Then things become really confusing: By default we look for multiple luns unless the SINGLE_LUN flag is present, unless it's a UFI device, we don't look for multiple luns, we assumpe one, unless the MULTIPLE_LUN flag exists, then we probe for multiple again." ? -- Phil Dibowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freeware and Technical Pages Insanity Palace of Metallica http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/ "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Suess
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
