Matthew Dharm said:
>
> The only things I can further suggest are:
> 1) combine lowering max_sectors with inter-command delay
> 2) mount with the 'sync' option (reduces speed and memory pressure)
>
I almost thought this one was going to do it. Got a little bit furthur in
the data transfer before it died.
I guess our current hardware just isn't going to let us go to the 2.6
kernel. We'll have to just upgrade to the latest 2.4 kernel and stay
there until we move to more current hardware. The real problem there
though is that even then we'll have to keep both versions around until all
of the old systems fade away.
Matt and Alan - thanks again for all your help.
/dwight
--
Dwight N. Tovey
Director of Product Engineering
EmergeCore Networks
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
