From: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:51:57 -0400 (EDT)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + if (limit_1 < 0) {
> > + ohci_warn(ohci, "Root port outer-loop reset timeout, "
> > + "now[%04x] reset_done[%04x]\n",
> > + now, reset_done);
> > + }
>
> What reason is there for having two warning messages? One ought to be
> enough.
In my patch it was possible for the inner loop one to succeed, but the
outer one to not do so.
In your's this is not the case so I guess it's OK.
I wonder if it's so wise trying to do two things at once. Here we are
adding the loop timeouts, and also changing to using jiffies based
timeouts rather than a chip timer register based one.
I preferred my patches because it solved one single problem, the lack
of loop limits. The timeout mechanism could have been changed in
another followon patch.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
