On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 02:53:14AM -0700, Nicolas Lopez wrote:
>> Ok, heres an updated device node naming guide. Thanks to everybody for
>> correcting it. Ideally we'd want the devices to show up the same with
>> devfs. So keep an eye out for deviations, so that they can be fixed.
>>
>> node c/b major:minor owner:group permitions
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> mustek char 10:171 root:video? 0660
>> input/js# char 13:0-31 root:root 0660
>> input/mouse# char 13:32-62 root:root 0660
>> input/mice char 13:62 (Mix mode) root:root 0660
>> input/event# char 13:64-95 root:root 0660
>> usb/ttyACM# char 166:0-31 root:dialout 0660
>> usb/usblp# char 180:0-15 root:lp 0660
>
>I think /dev/usb/lp# would be better, notice no other USB device nodes
>don't have the additional 'usb' prefix - what does everyone think?
I agree. The only time the 'usb' prefix should be tacked on is if
the device sits in /dev and would conflict with an already existing
device. An example obviously being /dev/lp0 and /dev/usblp0. Since
we are going to stick it in /dev/usb/, it should be lp#.
-Harold
--
"Life sucks, deal with it!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
