Greg KH writes:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 04:14:37PM -0600, Richard Gooch wrote:
> > Greg KH writes:
> > >
> > > Yes it does, it is "usb/tty/%d"
> >
> > If it's a serial driver, why not use "usb/tts/%d" instead?
>
> Good idea, I will change it next patch.
>
> > > In looking through the devfs documentation, I didn't see a list of
> > > where all of the drivers show up in the tree. Is that information
> > > available somewhere?
> >
> > Eh?!? Have you read the FAQ?
> > http://www.atnf.csiro.au/~rgooch/linux/docs/devfs.html
>
> Oops, I have read the FAQ many times (and it is very useful too),
> but what I meant to write was, "I don't see a list of where all of
> the _USB_ drivers show up in the tree."
Ah.
> > > And if not, would it be a useful thing for me to create?
> >
> > Fixes for omissions would be good. But it's there already.
>
> Since I am guessing that usb devices could be considered an
> omission, I will look into compiling a list of where the current usb
> drivers end up when running devfs (unless someone already has done
> this...)
Well, no-one has told me what the USB names are. I've only documented
what was in the devfs patch (and not all of that either).
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
