Jan Niehusmann wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 02:23:25AM -0100, Harm Verhagen wrote: > > [1.] One line summary of the problem: > > kernel 2.3.99pre7-9 oops on boot > > I get a similar oops with 2.3.99pre7-9 and 2.3.99pre7. > It's triggered by one of the following lines (in a rc-script): > /sbin/modprobe uhci > /sbin/modprobe usbmouse > /sbin/modprobe mousedev > > The oops goes away if I remove the "flags |= SLAB_POISON;"-Line introduced > in slap.c in pre7-9. So the bug is probably not new, but didn't get caught > up to now. > > This oops is probably not too usefull, as it occures somewhere in the > just loaded modules, so there is no symbol information available. As you > have uhci compiled into the kernel, your oops provides more information. > > Warning (compare_ksyms_lsmod): module nls_cp437 is in lsmod but not in ksyms, >probably no symbols exported > Warning (compare_ksyms_lsmod): module nls_iso8859-1 is in lsmod but not in ksyms, >probably no symbols exported > e820: 000a0000 @ 00000000 (usable) > e820: 00010000 @ 000f0000 (reserved) > e820: 0fefd000 @ 00100000 (usable) > e820: 00002000 @ 0fffd000 (ACPI data) > e820: 00001000 @ 0ffff000 (ACPI NVS) > e820: 00010000 @ ffff0000 (reserved) > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 5a5a5a62 > d087373d > *pde = 00000000 > Oops: 0002 > CPU: 0 > EIP: 0010:[<d087373d>] > Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386 > EFLAGS: 00010006 > eax: 5a5a5a5a ebx: 5a5a5a5a ecx: 00000046 edx: 5a5a5a5a > esi: cf929084 edi: cfe49030 ebp: cf3ef800 esp: c0283ecc > ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018 > Process swapper (pid: 0, stackpage=c0283000) > Stack: cf929020 d087fd2e 5a5a5a5a cf929020 d08800c3 cf929020 cf3ef800 cf929020 > cf3ffb80 cf929020 cfe49020 cf3ef800 cf3ffb80 00000000 00000082 cfe49020 > d088150a cf3ffb80 00000046 cf3ffb80 00000000 d08813c7 cf3ffb80 cf3efab0 > Call Trace: [<d087fd2e>] [<d08800c3>] [<d088150a>] [<d08813c7>] [<d08820cc>] >[<c010bc74>] [<c010bdde>] > [<c011086c>] [<d0802080>] [<c0108a80>] [<c010ae14>] [<c011086c>] [<d0802080>] >[<c0108a80>] [<c0110a8a>] > [<c011086c>] [<c0108a80>] [<c0108ae9>] [<c0105000>] [<c010018d>] > Code: ff 4b 08 0f 94 c0 84 c0 74 1e 53 e8 db 0b 00 00 8b 83 a4 00 > > >>EIP; d087373d <END_OF_CODE+3d5a9/????> <===== > Trace; d087fd2e <END_OF_CODE+49b9a/????> > Trace; d08800c3 <END_OF_CODE+49f2f/????> > Trace; d088150a <END_OF_CODE+4b376/????> > Trace; d08813c7 <END_OF_CODE+4b233/????> > Trace; d08820cc <END_OF_CODE+4bf38/????> > Trace; c010bc74 <handle_IRQ_event+34/60> > Trace; c010bdde <do_IRQ+6e/b4> > Trace; c011086c <acpi_idle+0/22c> > Trace; d0802080 <_end+10526878/1053d848> > Trace; c0108a80 <default_idle+0/28> > Trace; c010ae14 <ret_from_intr+0/20> > Trace; c011086c <acpi_idle+0/22c> > Trace; d0802080 <_end+10526878/1053d848> > Trace; c0108a80 <default_idle+0/28> > Trace; c0110a8a <acpi_idle+21e/22c> > Trace; c011086c <acpi_idle+0/22c> > Trace; c0108a80 <default_idle+0/28> > Trace; c0108ae9 <cpu_idle+41/54> > Trace; c0105000 <empty_bad_page+0/1000> > Trace; c010018d <L6+0/2> > Code; d087373d <END_OF_CODE+3d5a9/????> > 00000000 <_EIP>: > Code; d087373d <END_OF_CODE+3d5a9/????> <===== > 0: ff 4b 08 decl 0x8(%ebx) <===== > Code; d0873740 <END_OF_CODE+3d5ac/????> > 3: 0f 94 c0 sete %al > Code; d0873743 <END_OF_CODE+3d5af/????> > 6: 84 c0 test %al,%al > Code; d0873745 <END_OF_CODE+3d5b1/????> > 8: 74 1e je 28 <_EIP+0x28> d0873765 ><END_OF_CODE+3d5d1/????> > Code; d0873747 <END_OF_CODE+3d5b3/????> > a: 53 push %ebx > Code; d0873748 <END_OF_CODE+3d5b4/????> > b: e8 db 0b 00 00 call beb <_EIP+0xbeb> d0874328 ><END_OF_CODE+3e194/????> > Code; d087374d <END_OF_CODE+3d5b9/????> > 10: 8b 83 a4 00 00 00 mov 0xa4(%ebx),%eax > > Aiee, killing interrupt handler > Kernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle task! > > 2 warnings issued. Results may not be reliable. > hello, just observed exactly the same and found the above message on the kernel-mailing-list. joerg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
