> model for drivers. As I remember the flamewar on linux-kernel, UDI will
> not be adopted by Linux anytime soon (although the reference
> implementation is said to be done on Linux, I haven't seen any performance
> numbers.)
The Linux answer is the same as the MS answer (and I think in both cases
probably for techncially sound reasons). We get cleaner maintainable code
by chosing to do things right. Microkernel and isolation glue API's have a
very bad historical record (eg Mach) for general purpose systems.
> Due to this, I think the only OSs that are/will supporting OpenUSBDI are
> DigitalUnix, SCO, and perhaps Sun. I know I stopped attending / paying
Sun are the only one of those with market share.
Alan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
