> > In addition to the init ordering issue with the initial
> > patch ("usbcore" didn't get initted first),
>
> My initial patch already took care of that - it didn't cater for the case
> when there were many copies of input.o being linked in.
Not according to boot messages when I ran it.
The usbdevfs and hub drivers were initted last,
not first ... meaning that driver modules had
their init sections run before usbcore.
That may not be something to worry about though,
since the driver inits should only add drivers
to that list
- Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
