On Friday 20 July 2012 20:33:32 Ming Lei wrote:
> The RFC patch is just for discussing if the idea of deferring
> request_firmware is doable for addressing the issue of
> request_firmware in resume path, which is caused by driver
> unbind/rebind during resume.
>
> At least usb bus is involved in such things, one driver may be
> unbound and rebound in resume path at several situations, and
> request_firmware is often called inside probe().
>
> Also the idea should be helpful for other hotplug buses too,
> at least there was the similar problem report on pcmcia bus.
The approach seems to me to be less comprehensive than
it ought to be. If you defer, why not the whole probe()?
Deferring only the upoad of the firmware complicates
error handling.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
