On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:33:27 +0200, Bjørn Mork <bj...@mork.no> wrote:
Lan Tianyu <tianyu....@intel.com> writes:
Not directly related to this patch, but a question I started wondering
about recently: Is there some generic guideline wrt parsing boolean
flags in sysfs? If not, shouldn't there be?
I see a lot of different approaches implementing this basic function.
Personally I would prefer if they all did something like the
set_usb2_hardware_lpm in drivers/usb/core/sysfs.c:
[...]
ret = strtobool(buf, &value);
[...]
Using strtobool() to allow "Y", "yes", "1" etc makes a nice user
interface IMHO. Unless of course the variable is a true integer which
only happens to currently allow 0 and 1, but may be extended with more
values later.
I'd say that if someone is handling sysfs directly, he has burn in his brain
that 0 is false and 1 is true. ;) (Shell complicates things a little, but
still I feel that for sysfs users the connection is obvious.) Because of that,
I stick to kstrtouint().
Also, I don't like how strtobool() treats "01" as a false value.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: m...@google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
