On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Tomas Sokorai wrote:

> Ding, Ding, Ding!, we have a winner :-)
> I did an ugly check:
> 
>       if (ohci->ed_rm_list)
>               finish_unlinks (ohci, ohci_frame_no(ohci));
>       if ((ints & OHCI_INTR_SF) != 0
>                       && !ohci->ed_rm_list
>                       && !ohci->ed_to_check
>                       && ohci->rh_state == OHCI_RH_RUNNING)
>               ohci_writel (ohci, OHCI_INTR_SF, &regs->intrdisable);
>       else if ((ints & OHCI_INTR_SF) != 0
>                       && ohci->ed_rm_list
>                       && !ohci->ed_to_check
>                       && ohci->rh_state == OHCI_RH_RUNNING)
>               ohci_warn(ohci,"SF intr should have been disabled, but 
> ed_rm_list is
> not empty\n");
>       spin_unlock (&ohci->lock);
> 
> Result: The ed_rm_list definitely stays not null forever after the hang.
> 
> This non-empty ed_rm_list condition is raised even when not hung at
> quite a rate, but after its hung, this lovely message does a while(1)
> dmesg benchmark :-)

It's normal to see this happen during ordinary use, although perhaps 
your rate is higher than it should be.  Anyway, the next step is to 
look inside finish_unlinks() in ohci-q.c to figure out what's going 
wrong.

I don't have time today to look further into this, but I'll get back to 
you later.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to