On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:11:53AM +0800, Chen Peter-B29397 wrote:
>  
> > > >
> > > It is the same with i.mx28.
> > If they're same, imx23 should be ok. The mxs_phy driver pass test
> > on mx28.
> > > I think Richard's patch should not
> > > violate point 2. Richard, can you confirm it?
> > You mean I should not set the bit in mxs_phy_on_connect?
> > or mxs_phy_on_connect is called in wrong place?
> > 
> 
> HW_USBPHY_CTRL.ENHOSTDISCONDETECT should be set after bus reset is finished.
So I guess you mean "mxs_phy_on_connect is called in wrong place". Then this
patch is incorrect.
> 
> > Thanks
> > Richard
> > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Fabio Estevam
> > >

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to