On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:35:07PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote: >> Hi Sebastian, >> >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior >> <bige...@linutronix.de> wrote: >> > The "driver" struct for a gadget driver is named *_driver. On module >> > load, the gadget expects a UDC driver to be loaded and avaiable. If this >> > is not the case => -ENODEV and bye bye. That means that the gadget >> Will this be taken care of in your future series (with configfs?). >> There might be cases when your gadget driver gets loaded before the >> UDC driver. > > with configfs that won't be a problem because even though function > drivers are loaded, they won't bind to any controller until we tell them > to through configfs. IOW, functions will only bind to UDCs after we > assign them to a particular usb interface through configfs.
Ok. Makes sense.. Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
