* Michal Nazarewicz | 2012-08-24 19:09:06 [+0200]:

>Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de> writes:
>> This patch removes the global variable usb_composite_driver() in
>
>s/()//, otherwise it looks like a function name. :)
fixed in v3.

>> @@ -1401,7 +1401,7 @@ static int udc_wakeup(struct usb_gadget *gadget)
>> index 29d5f70..598df69 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
>>   * String parameters are in UTF-8 (superset of ASCII's 7 bit characters).
>> @@ -889,6 +887,7 @@ static int lookup_string(
>>  static int get_string(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev,
>>              void *buf, u16 language, int id)
>>  {
>> +    struct usb_composite_driver     *cdriver = cdev->driver;
>
>Should you keep the ???composite??? name for the variable, the rest of the
>patch would be a bit shorter. :)

Seriously? I have it now consistent within the file. The second series
which little large would clash here. I would prefer to avoid this if
possible.

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to