On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 03:05:09PM +0200, Jarkko Huijts wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 07:59 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 12:21:56PM +0200, Jarkko Huijts wrote:
> > > I have e-mailed FTDI's support to ask whether the assumptions described
> > > above are true and whether there is no register to read the actual
> > > amount of data in the hardware buffer(s). Their website states you need
> > > to sign an NDA to get the register descriptions, but with some luck that
> > > isn't needed.
> 
> OK, no luck. I got a reply that pretty much said "please sign this NDA"
> and since I'm not a lawyer, I'm not sure whether the conditions would
> allow me to use their datasheet for GPL code.
> 
> > Your function looks good, care to add it to the file and create a patch
> > so that I can apply it properly to the kernel tree?
> 
> Sure. I've made a patch for the latest stable (v3.6.1) using git. Let me
> know if anything if not OK.
> 
> Note: The code shown in this thread was for v2.6.38. Two new types of
> FTDI device are supported in v3.6.1. I've updated my code in the same as
> ftdi_tiocmget().

The patch looks great, thanks so much for doing this.  I'll queue it up
after 3.7-rc1 is released by Linus (which should be in a few days).

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to