Hi Felipe, On Monday 22 October 2012 13:56:01 Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Monday 22 October 2012 03:33:19 Li Yang-R58472 wrote: > > > On Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Simon Haggett wrote: > > > > > Some gadget drivers may attempt to dequeue requests for an endpoint > > > > > that has already been disabled. For example, in the UVC gadget > > > > > driver, uvc_function_set_alt() will call usb_ep_disable() when alt > > > > > setting 0 is selected. When the userspace application subsequently > > > > > issues the VIDIOC_STREAMOFF ioctl, uvc_video_enable() invokes > > > > > usb_ep_dequeue() to ensure that all requests have been cancelled. > > > > > > > > bug is on uvc gadget, then. Laurent ? > > > > We've discussed this topic a couple of months before. I believe that's not > > a bug. > > > > http://68.183.106.108/lists/linux-usb/msg68869.html > > fair enough :-) > > That's a different case, however. At the link above we're discussing > dequeueing a request which is already being dequeued. $SUBJECT is trying > to fix dequeueing of a request for an endpoint which isn't even enabled.
You've got a point there :-) That's a different case indeed, I'm open to (at least evaluating) a fix in the UVC gadget driver if you think that's better. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.