Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2012, 14:11 +0100 schrieb Oliver Neukum:
> On Tuesday 18 December 2012 13:10:25 Lucas Stach wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/usb/usbnet.h b/include/linux/usb/usbnet.h
> > index 9bbeabf..8e9516f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/usb/usbnet.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/usb/usbnet.h
> > @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ struct driver_info {
> >   */
> >  #define FLAG_MULTI_PACKET      0x2000
> >  #define FLAG_RX_ASSEMBLE       0x4000  /* rx packets may span >1 frames */
> > +#define FLAG_EEPROM_MAC                0x8000  /* initialize device MAC 
> > from eeprom */
> 
> Hi,
> 
> this looks sensible, but
> why are you adding a flag unused in usbnet to usbnet.h?

Right, this might not be the right place to add this. Could you point me
to a more appropriate place? The data member of usbnet might be a good
place to stuff this into, but why is this a plain long and not some kind
of pointer? It is used for a different purpose on other ASIX chips
already.

Regards,
Lucas


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to