Hi John, On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 08:52:39PM +0000, John Stultz wrote: > This reverts commit 25ad17d692ad54c3c33b2a31e5ce2a82e38de14e, > as with other patches backported to -stable, we can now apply > the actual upstream commit that matches this. > > Cc: Fei Yang <[email protected]> > Cc: Sam Protsenko <[email protected]> > Cc: Felipe Balbi <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] # 4.19.y > Signed-off-by: John Stultz <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c > index 879f652c5580..843586f20572 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c > @@ -177,8 +177,6 @@ static void dwc3_gadget_del_and_unmap_request(struct > dwc3_ep *dep, > req->started = false; > list_del(&req->list); > req->remaining = 0; > - req->unaligned = false; > - req->zero = false;
Given that these structure members are removed in Patch 1/9, wouldn't having these lines remain until this revert patch present compilation errors when applying the patches in this series individually? For bisectability would it be better to fix-up Patch 1 to also convert these two flags to req->needs_extra_trb in one shot? Alternatively you could sandwich Patch 1 between Patch 8 & 9. Thanks, Jack -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
