On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:38:50AM +0000, Chao Xie wrote:
> All blocks are removed. Add the device tree support for ehci.
Similarly to the last two patches, could you please add a binding document?
> Signed-off-by: Chao Xie <chao....@marvell.com>
> Acked-by: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-mv.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mv.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mv.c
> index 171e145..79eca0c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mv.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mv.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/usb/otg.h>
> #include <linux/usb/mv_usb2.h>
> @@ -32,11 +33,9 @@ struct ehci_hcd_mv {
>
> struct usb_phy *otg;
>
> - struct mv_usb_platform_data *pdata;
> -
> /* clock source and total clock number */
> unsigned int clknum;
> - struct clk *clk[0];
> + struct clk **clk;
> };
>
> static void ehci_clock_enable(struct ehci_hcd_mv *ehci_mv)
> @@ -138,22 +137,55 @@ static const struct hc_driver mv_ehci_hc_driver = {
> .bus_resume = ehci_bus_resume,
> };
>
> +static int mv_ehci_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct ehci_hcd_mv *ehci_mv)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + unsigned int clks_num;
> + int i, ret;
> + const char *clk_name;
> +
> + if (!np)
> + return 1;
Perhaps -ENODEV?
> +
> + clks_num = of_property_count_strings(np, "clocks");
> + if (clks_num < 0)
> + return clks_num;
> +
> + ehci_mv->clk = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> + sizeof(struct clk *) * clks_num, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (ehci_mv->clk == NULL)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < clks_num; i++) {
> + ret = of_property_read_string_index(np, "clocks", i,
> + &clk_name);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + ehci_mv->clk[i] = clk_get(NULL, clk_name);
> + if (IS_ERR(ehci_mv->clk[i]))
> + return PTR_ERR(ehci_mv->clk[i]);
> + }
> +
> + ehci_mv->clknum = clks_num;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "mode", &ehci_mv->mode);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
Again, this is a bad idea.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int mv_ehci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct mv_usb_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> struct usb_hcd *hcd;
> struct ehci_hcd *ehci;
> struct ehci_hcd_mv *ehci_mv;
> struct resource *r;
> - int clk_i, retval = -ENODEV;
> + int retval = -ENODEV;
> u32 offset;
> size_t size;
>
> - if (!pdata) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing platform_data\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> -
> if (usb_disabled())
> return -ENODEV;
>
> @@ -161,7 +193,7 @@ static int mv_ehci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!hcd)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - size = sizeof(*ehci_mv) + sizeof(struct clk *) * pdata->clknum;
> + size = sizeof(*ehci_mv);
> ehci_mv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (ehci_mv == NULL) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot allocate ehci_hcd_mv\n");
> @@ -170,19 +202,36 @@ static int mv_ehci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ehci_mv);
> - ehci_mv->pdata = pdata;
> ehci_mv->hcd = hcd;
>
> - ehci_mv->clknum = pdata->clknum;
> - for (clk_i = 0; clk_i < ehci_mv->clknum; clk_i++) {
> - ehci_mv->clk[clk_i] =
> - devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, pdata->clkname[clk_i]);
> - if (IS_ERR(ehci_mv->clk[clk_i])) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error get clck \"%s\"\n",
> - pdata->clkname[clk_i]);
> - retval = PTR_ERR(ehci_mv->clk[clk_i]);
> - goto err_clear_drvdata;
> + retval = mv_ehci_parse_dt(pdev, ehci_mv);
> + if (retval > 0) {
Is this why you returned 1 from mv_ehci_parse_dt? So you only do this if you
don't have a dt node?
If so, why not rip the check (and positive error code) out of mv_ehci_parse_dt,
and then here:
if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
retval = mv_ehci_parse_dt(pdev, ehci_mv);
} else
fall back to mv_usb_platform_data ...
}
That makes it obvious that one side depends on dt and the other's a fallback,
and doesn't rely on nonstandard return code behaviour.
Also, why not return immediately if mv_ehci_parse_dt fails?
[...]
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
